My
cup of tea for you !
Friends !! Today, early
morning, I am so happy to serve you a special hot cup of tea, which I have
prepared from the blending of some unique ingredients. But I am harbouring a doubt also whether you
will really enjoy its taste or not. The reason is: when I served this tea to my
friends and sisters –some of them liked its taste and others did not. However,
all of them have their different opinions and reasons. And I found that no two
tea-tasters, if I call them so, had the same observation. Rather, none agree in
their explanation too. I was surprised and was little disappointed also to
realize that my wonder effort had gone in vain.
I don’t think you ever…ever… have a sip of this kind of tea––absolutely
my artistic creation. I was little upset too. So, first, I choose to offer you
for your feed-back.
You might argue that it
is a virtual tea, so how can one provide one’s opinion regarding its taste.
Don’t be bothered, friends!!! all tea-s are virtual vis- a- vis all tastes are virtual, so you
should not worry about your opinion. Be frank, so that I can overcome my angst.
Of course, I was not so
easily to be gulped down by disappointment, so I was pondering – where was I
wrong with my tea. Normally, I feel so proud of my tea-making that if anyone
comes to my home, I jump on my toe to prepare tea for him. I do not allow
others to take hold of the tea-pot and other accessories. I often relish an episode when one of my
teacher asked me, “What are you going to do with your Philosophy (Hons) degree
?”, I had a ready answer that I will open a tea shop and will serve variety of
tea to (পাডা-passers-by). Still, I
have not yet given up the idea of tea-making. Often I experiment and fulfill my
desire of being a ‘tea-maker’ for my friends and family. I fondly remember
another incident of my great teacher who stayed just two kilometer away from my
old house (now I stay 20 kilometer away from his place) used to come to my
house just to have a cup of tea made by me. So I had a wild assumption about
myself that I am a good tea-maker, if not the best. I was so confident about the taste (rasa)
of my mixing of pharmacological properties and
actions of the ingredients that I used to think that it need not be validated
by any scientific hypothesis. I used to be sure that alchemical operations will
be just right for the guest or for the family members, for whomsoever tea is
prepared. I normally take care of the therapeutic principle of harmony
among the five primal elements -- earth, water, fire, air and ether-- while
mixing the ingredients, that produces rasa (taste) in the body, because
their disproportionate mixture may disturb the body-concord.
But this time I was
disillusioned somehow and I am sharing my disillusionment with my FB friends. I
am offering them my new creation of virtual tea which I have made early in the
morning as a routine affair, which I usually do. No one can doubt that the FB
tea is virtual in all senses—the cup is virtual, the tea is virtual and the
important thing is its taste is virtual. Though I never thought that in reality
taste can be virtual also, but that happened yesterday when my friends did not
like the taste, barring few of them! I
was shocked and my pride was wounded.
But as soon as the idea cropped into my mind that any taste -- be it
sweet, bitter, acid, sour etc is virtual in all respects--- my so-called
‘disappointment’ was peter out. But one wonders how the personal tragedy
sometimes inspires, like Vālmiki, to write the Ramayana spontaneously
emanating from his being overpowered by an intense feeling of pathos, which
is the context of ātma-mukti – a way of catharsis to dilute one’s sorrow
through tea-making.
Let us analyse
how it happens. The word rasa is associated with palate, carries
with it a different meaning and often gets elevated to the domain of art and
beauty too by default. Making tea is analogous to the preparation of a dish the
taste of which is derived from the melding of numerous ingredients. It also,
thereby, justifies the metaphor of taste for an aesthetic degustation which may
be regarded as existing at once in the food, the taster, and the act of
tasting--- concept
of aesthetic flavour, an essential element of any work of visual,
literary, or performing art that can only be suggested, not described.
Since our childhood we have been taught that taste resides in our taste-buds so whoever is relishing anything keeping on his tongue, he enjoys only his taste-buds only. It is not the tea or whatsoever which is tasteful, it is the tongue which holds the taste. If there is no tongue there will be no taste whatsoever. We have been taught in our undergraduate classes that the whole world will remain non-existing for us if we do not have any senses, so called five senses. Unless one has sense organ one cannot prove the existence of the taste vis-à-vis any kind of sense-experience. Imagine my friends !! Just imagine !! I am afraid it will be a weird world. My God !! The existence of the taste of the tea is now under microscopic observation captured by the so called skeptics. The resident of the taste is not the taste buds but the Rasikajana (connoisseur) who enjoys it. Are you not aware of the example, that a song, a drama, a literary piece, a mural painting produce rasa (taste) in the audience or spectator? How can rasa be in the drama, poetry or music? Wait please, my friends !!! The cup which holds my tea never !!! never can taste the tea it carries. Though it has continued to carry the beverages since its inception and will continue to carry as long as the planet will exist, yet the cup will never have the taste of the tea. Each one of us is like a cup—the holder of the tea merely. So how can we poor creature taste in unanimous way? Why should there be unanimity in taste when our society is plural and we possess multiple cultures?
Taste refers to the
dynamics of emotional representation of flavors crafted into the work (my work
is tea here for your consideration) by the writer and relished by a 'sensitive
spectator' or sahṛdaya, literally one who "has
heart", and can connect to the work with emotion. A rasa, so to say, is a synthetic phenomenon
and the goal of any creative performance art. It seems to be conveying a notion
of selfhood or personhood which is unique and innovative for the creator.
If taste would have
been there in the tea all would have the same kind of taste and no two persons
will differ in their opinion. Had it been the case that it resides in the cup,
it is the cup that will enjoy the taste of the tea first and we, the recipient,
will be having the residue of the cup only, but neither can cup taste it, nor
can we. If it resides in the taste buds
then definitely it will differ from person to person. It is my taste-buds only,
it is none others’. Your taste-bud is yours, and not mine. So our perspective
differs. And, lo!! We have infinite number of perspectives – add them
together and you will be transported to a parallel
reality, full of wonder and bliss, where one experiences the essence of
one’s own consciousness and reflects on.
The idea was constantly buzzing in my head and I was robbed off my foolish pride of making wonder-tea. I started mocking my own fate because my courage of appreciating my own creation of tea was now blunted by my thought. Tears rolled from my eyes both of joy and sorrow for I was a good tea-maker and now no longer an excellent tea-maker. Nevertheless:
I glorify the art
of tea-making…
Nay, the refinement of the self !
The tea-taster recreates himself,
creates the tea made of ingredients.
Time consumes for boiling,
at a certain temperature…
And, finally, it is there streaming hot ---
On the table, spreading its aroma,
Tempting you --to have its taste!!!
Comments
Post a Comment